Hi,

We noticed that the 'with'-loop has no (working) 'loop_count' functionality:

with x in (:1,2,3,4,5) do => {^
#x; ' - '; loop_count; '<br>';
^}

Output:

1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 0
5 - 0


L9.2.5, Mac OS 10.8.2

Is this so wanted? I rather have a loop_count present in all looping types.
If you try to read the docs about the 'with' statement... there are no docs about the with statement.

- -
Marc

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list Lasso
Lasso@lists.lassosoft.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <Lasso-unsubscribe@lists.lassosoft.com>
Send administrative queries to <Lasso-request@lists.lassosoft.com>